I understand that they are concerned about the rotator cuff issue that he had since he was with the Marlins. However, since being in Boston, Beckett has made 30 starts 3 out of the 4 years he has been here. The exception being when he made 27 starts in 2008.
The Sox had no problems giving John Lackey, who is older than Beckett, a 5 year deal. Beckett has more starts over the last 3 seasons than Lackey does. Lackey has elbow problems. For some reason, the Red Sox gave Lackey a 5 year deal. In the 5th year of that deal, there is a clause that if Lackey has problems with that elbow that cause him to miss significant time, he will only be paid the minimum. Couldn't they offer the same thing to Beckett?
I'm just confused about some of the ways the Red Sox do business. They seem to throw their money around freely and over pay for certain players, but when it comes to players who have really earned the money, they decide to draw the line. They refused to give Johnny Damon a 4th year back at the end of the 2005 season after Damon had 4 extremely good seasons here and helped the Red Sox win the World Series in 2004. Damon went on to have 4 more very good years with the Yankees despite the Red Sox belief that the 4th year would be a problem. They opted to sign Coco Crisp instead. How'd that work out?
Should Josh Beckett decide to walk at the end of this season, the Red Sox will have no one to blame but themselves. Beckett may very well get hurt next year or the year after, but you can say that about any player. I hate to use the word respect when dealing with these issues, because ALL of these players get paid way too much. However, Beckett's track record deserves a little more respect than what the Sox are giving him.